Law Centres Network responds to judgement in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys

This judgment gives welcome confirmation that the way Law Centres work—bringing together solicitors and highly skilled caseworkers within a robust supervisory framework—is lawful. That clarity matters and gives us the confidence to continue providing vital legal support to people facing some of the most difficult moments in their lives.

Every day, Law Centres support individuals who would otherwise have to navigate the legal system alone: people at risk of losing their homes, their income, or facing discrimination. For many, the alternative is not a different provider—it is no help at all. This judgment recognises, in practical terms, how legal help is delivered on the frontline, and why that matters.

At a time when access to justice organisations are already operating under significant pressure—from sustained funding constraints and to rising demand—this clarity is critical. It helps ensure that the legal system remains accessible not only to those who can afford representation, but also to those who cannot.

It is also a significant moment for the many people who find themselves standing up in court without representation. By supporting models that enable more legal help to be delivered effectively, today’s decision helps ensure that fewer people are left to face the justice system alone.

We are deeply grateful to our exceptional legal team—Maeve Hanna, Jennifer Wyatt-Molloy, Sarah Morreau and Arthur Tan at A&O Shearman; and PJ Kirby KC, James Hall and Thomas G. C. Hood at Gatehouse Chambers—for their pro bono support in ensuring the court had a full understanding of what is at stake for access to justice.

LCN will continue to work with regulators, government and partners to ensure this clarity is embedded in a way that supports high-quality, accessible legal services for all.

For media enquiries, please contact media@lawcentres.org.uk.